try {
existing = getItemManager().getNode(destPath);
// there's already a node with that name:
// check same-name sibling setting of existing node
if (!existing.getDefinition().allowsSameNameSiblings()) {
throw new ItemExistsException(
"Same name siblings are not allowed: " + existing);
}
} catch (AccessDeniedException ade) {
// FIXME by throwing ItemExistsException we're disclosing too much information
throw new ItemExistsException(destAbsPath);
} catch (PathNotFoundException pnfe) {
// no name collision, fall through
}
// verify for both source and destination parent nodes that
// - they are checked-out
// - are not protected neither by node type constraints nor by retention/hold
int options = ItemValidator.CHECK_CHECKED_OUT | ItemValidator.CHECK_LOCK |
ItemValidator.CHECK_CONSTRAINTS | ItemValidator.CHECK_HOLD | ItemValidator.CHECK_RETENTION;
getValidator().checkRemove(srcParentNode, options, Permission.NONE);
getValidator().checkModify(destParentNode, options, Permission.NONE);
// check constraints
// get applicable definition of target node at new location
NodeTypeImpl nt = (NodeTypeImpl) targetNode.getPrimaryNodeType();
org.apache.jackrabbit.spi.commons.nodetype.NodeDefinitionImpl newTargetDef;
try {
newTargetDef = destParentNode.getApplicableChildNodeDefinition(destName.getName(), nt.getQName());
} catch (RepositoryException re) {
String msg = destAbsPath + ": no definition found in parent node's node type for new node";
log.debug(msg);
throw new ConstraintViolationException(msg, re);
}
// if there's already a node with that name also check same-name sibling
// setting of new node; just checking same-name sibling setting on
// existing node is not sufficient since same-name sibling nodes don't
// necessarily have identical definitions
if (existing != null && !newTargetDef.allowsSameNameSiblings()) {
throw new ItemExistsException(
"Same name siblings not allowed: " + existing);
}
NodeId targetId = targetNode.getNodeId();
int index = srcName.getIndex();